Sources and ingestion
Connect documents, databases and SaaS systems, clean and chunk content, and keep the index current as sources change.
We design, build and operate retrieval-augmented generation systems on Azure OpenAI and Azure AI Search: ingestion, permission-aware retrieval, citations and evaluation.

For product and technology leaders who need AI answers grounded in company documents, records or product data. We begin with the business context and the systems already in place, then shape a delivery path around what needs to work.
A RAG system is only as good as the content it retrieves. Before choosing models or vector stores, we map the questions users actually ask, the sources that hold the answers, who is allowed to see what, and how answers will be checked.
For product and technology leaders who need AI answers grounded in company documents, records or product data. The first useful step is to define what needs to change, how the current environment shapes the work and which outcome the team needs to be able to assess.
The exact scope depends on your systems and constraints. These workstreams describe common parts of this solution area.
Connect documents, databases and SaaS systems, clean and chunk content, and keep the index current as sources change.
Combine vector and keyword search, re-rank results, enforce permissions and return answers with the passages behind them.
Score answers against real questions, track cost and latency, and review failures so quality improves after launch.
Retrieval-augmented generation lets a language model answer from your own content instead of its training data. The model is the easy part. Most of the engineering is in getting the right content to the model, for the right user, and proving the answer is correct.
Answer staff questions from policies, procedures, contracts, tickets and wiki pages, with links to the source passage.
Add natural-language search and answers to a SaaS product, scoped to each customer’s own data.
Ask questions across large sets of PDFs, scanned files and spreadsheets, including tables and structured fields.
Draft replies grounded in product documentation and past cases, with a person approving what is sent.
Give agents a reliable retrieval tool so the actions they take are based on current, approved information.
Review a RAG system that answers inconsistently, find where retrieval fails and fix the pipeline.
Poor answers usually come from one weak stage in the pipeline, not from the model. We engineer and test each stage separately so problems can be found and fixed.
Connectors for SharePoint, file storage, databases and SaaS APIs. Parsing for PDFs, Office files, HTML and scanned images, with change detection to keep the index current.
Chunk size and structure chosen per document type, with titles, sections, dates, owners and access labels stored alongside each chunk.
Embedding model selection, vector and keyword indexes in Azure AI Search or another store, and re-indexing when models change.
Hybrid vector and keyword search, filters on metadata, re-ranking and query rewriting, so the most relevant passages reach the model.
Retrieval filtered by the signed-in user’s rights, typically mapped from Microsoft Entra ID groups or your application roles, so nobody sees content they should not.
Prompts that keep the model to the retrieved content, answers with citations, and a clear “I don’t know” or hand-off when the sources do not cover the question.
A RAG demo can look correct on ten documents and fail on ten thousand. We measure quality before launch and keep measuring after it.
A set of real questions with expected answers and sources, built with your subject experts.
Separate scores for whether the right passages were found and whether the answer used them correctly.
The evaluation set runs on every change to prompts, models, chunking or retrieval settings.
Tokens, search calls and response time measured per question, with budgets and alerts.
User ratings and flagged answers routed back for review and used to improve the index and prompts.
Use these questions to judge whether a RAG project is ready to build, or why an existing one is underperforming.
Request an assessmentMove from a defined initiative to an operating system through focused, reviewable stages.
Agree on the users, business context, systems and constraints that define the initiative.
Connect architecture, integrations, data, security and delivery decisions to the needs already identified.
Deliver and review the system in stages so the work can respond to product and operational feedback.
Consider ownership, monitoring, support and the next improvements as part of the delivery plan.
RAG development services cover the design and engineering of retrieval-augmented generation systems: connecting your content sources, indexing and searching them, passing the right passages to a language model, returning answers with citations and measuring quality. The goal is AI answers grounded in your data rather than the model’s general knowledge.
Use RAG when answers must come from content that changes, must be cited, or must respect user permissions. Fine-tuning changes how a model writes or behaves, but it is a poor way to keep facts current. Many production systems use RAG alone; some combine both.
Yes. Azure OpenAI with Azure AI Search is our most common foundation, together with Microsoft Entra ID for access control and Azure storage and functions for ingestion. We can use other model providers or vector stores when there is a reason to.
Yes, and it should. We store access information with each chunk and filter retrieval by the signed-in user’s groups or roles, so the model never receives content that user is not allowed to see.
By improving retrieval first, keeping the model to the retrieved passages, requiring citations, returning “not found” when sources do not cover a question, and measuring answer accuracy against an evaluation set on every change.
Yes. We start by testing it against real questions, find whether failures come from ingestion, chunking, retrieval, permissions or the prompt, and fix the weakest stages first. A rebuild is rarely the first step.
Most text-based content: PDFs, Office documents, web pages, wikis, tickets, emails, database records and SaaS data through APIs. Scanned documents and tables need extra processing, which we plan for during discovery.
It depends on the number of sources, access rules and integrations. A short discovery defines the scope, the evaluation set and a realistic delivery plan before build work begins.
Explore projects that show how we’ve approached similar product, AI and platform challenges.
A production-oriented RAG pipeline combining vector search, agent workflows and private model components.
Read the storyA real-time engineering workflow for processing travel data across documents and reservation integrations.
Read the storyA modular SaaS platform connecting deal intelligence, CRM workflows and Microsoft Marketplace commerce.
Read the story